[2]HooperJE, HebertJF, SchillingA, et al. Hybrid Capture 2 is as effective as PCR testing for high–risk human papillomavirus in head and neck cancers[J]. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol, 2015, 23(4): 266–272.
[5]OzakiS, KatoK, AbeY, et al. Analytical performance of newly developed multiplex human papillomavirus genotyping assay using Luminex xMAP™ technology (Mebgen™ HPV Kit) [J]. J Virol Methods, 2014, 204: 73–80.
[6]MilitelloV, LavezzoE, CostanziG, et al. Accurate human papillomavirus genotyping by 454 pyrosequencing[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2013, 19(10): E428–434.
[7]AlamedaF, GarroteL, MojalS, et al. Cervista HPV HR test for cervical cancer screening:a comparative study in the Catalonian population[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2015, 139(2): 241–244.
[8]MunkhdelgerJ, KimG, WangHY, et al. Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA RT–qPCR for screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer with ThinPrep Pap test samples[J]. Exp Mol Pathol, 2014, 97(2): 279–284.
[9]RatnamS, CoutleeF, FontaineD, et al. Aptima HPV E6/E7 mRNA test is as sensitive as Hybrid Capture 2 Assay but more specific at detecting cervical precancer and cancer[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2011, 49(2): 557–564.
[10]StolerMH, WrightTC, CuzickJ, et al. APTIMA HPV assay performance in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology results[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 208(2): 144.e1–8.