|
沙发
楼主 |
发表于 2015-11-13 15:11:37
|
只看该作者
Polymorphisms of large effect explain the majority of the host genetic contribution to variation of HIV-1 virus load.
McLaren PJ1, Coulonges C2, Bartha I1, Lenz TL3, Deutsch AJ4, Bashirova A5, Buchbinder S6, Carrington MN7, Cossarizza A8, Dalmau J9, De Luca A10, Goedert JJ11, Gurdasani D12, Haas DW13, Herbeck JT14, Johnson EO15, Kirk GD16, Lambotte O17, Luo M18, Mallal S19, van Manen D20, Martinez-Picado J21, Meyer L22, Miro JM23, Mullins JI24, Obel N25, Poli G26, Sandhu MS12, Schuitemaker H20, Shea PR27, Theodorou I28, Walker BD29, Weintrob AC30, Winkler CA31, Wolinsky SM32, Raychaudhuri S33, Goldstein DB27, Telenti A34, de Bakker PI35, Zagury JF2, Fellay J36.
Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of HIV-1-infected populations have been underpowered to detect common variants with moderate impact on disease outcome and have not assessed the phenotypic variance explained by genome-wide additive effects. By combining the majority of available genome-wide genotyping data in HIV-infected populations, we tested for association between ∼8 million variants and viral load (HIV RNA copies per milliliter of plasma) in 6,315 individuals of European ancestry. The strongest signal of association was observed in the HLA class I region that was fully explained by independent effects mapping to five variable amino acid positions in the peptide binding grooves of the HLA-B and HLA-A proteins. We observed a second genome-wide significant association signal in the chemokine (C-C motif) receptor (CCR) gene cluster on chromosome 3. Conditional analysis showed that this signal could not be fully attributed to the known protective CCR5Δ32 allele and the risk P1 haplotype, suggesting further causal variants in this region. Heritability analysis demonstrated that common human genetic variation-mostly in the HLA and CCR5 regions-explains 25% of the variability in viral load. This study suggests that analyses in non-European populations and of variant classes not assessed by GWAS should be priorities for the field going forward.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/11/04/1514867112.long |
|